HappyPet — Session Handoff (2026-07-20)

Ground truth as of commit 8d46e73 on main. Working tree clean except two long-standing untracked files (CLAUDE.md, GENERATION_RESULT.json) — leave them, they are pre-existing and gitignored-in-spirit. Test suite: ./.venv/Scripts/python.exe -m pytest test_pipeline.py -q125 passed, 0 failed (the old 2 Windows-cp1252 failures were fixed this session).

Full review + phased plan (the “F1–F17” item IDs referenced below) lives in docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-20-happypet-autonomy-review-and-plan.md. Auto-memory index: ~/.claude/projects/C--Users-derek-MAEVE-HappyPet/memory/happypet-autonomy-plan.md.

1. Mission

HappyPet is a Jekyll affiliate blog (happypetproductreviews.com) with a Python + GitHub Actions content pipeline (generate → publish → deploy → pin). The goal is to run the content pipeline autonomously. This session did a multi-model code review, shipped the autonomy-readiness fixes, and then chased the real blocker: the generator’s output can’t clear a deliberately strict anti-AI reviewer, so every article gets held instead of published. The pipeline plumbing works end-to-end; the open problem is generation quality vs. the review bar.

2. Current State

Working and verified (all merged to main this session, 13 PRs):

The blocker — two supervised live runs HELD (did not publish):

Exact next action: Implement the deterministic em-dash strip (F3-adjacent). No LLM — Gemini or Claude — emits exactly 0 em dashes, and the reviewer rule is “any em dash = FAIL.” Strip (U+2014 → hyphen/comma) from the article body right before the review gate, mirroring the existing scrub_banned_phrases. This is a ~10-line, fully-testable change and is the single fix most likely to flip “held” → “passed.” Then do one supervised confirmation run (gh workflow run generate.yml -f force_cap=1, ~2¢) to see where human_voice/warmth land — that’s the only remaining unknown, and it drives the Open Question about the ≥4 bar.

3. Decisions Made (and Why)

4. Architecture & Key Files

5. Gotchas & Hard-Won Knowledge

6. Conventions In Play

7. Open Questions

  1. After the em-dash strip + a confirmation run, does human_voice clear the bar? If it lands at 3, the Director must choose: (a) lower human_voice/warmth pass threshold 4→3 (keep fabrication/first-person as hard holds), (b) try Opus as generator (more cost, uncertain), or (c) human-in-the-loop on held articles. Do not lower the quality bar without an explicit yes — it changes the site’s content standard.
  2. When to spend on confirmation runs? Each is ~2¢ and, if it passes, publishes one LIVE article + Pinterest pin. Director controls timing.
  3. Go-live “go” for the generate.yml cron — unchanged, still his call, after a clean supervised run.
  4. Mark CI — Tests / pytest a required status check in main branch protection (UI action, can’t be done from code).

8. Do Not Touch

Deferred backlog (optional, non-blocking): F9 auth-failure alerting, F10 Chewy tokenization consistency, F13 remove dead groq_key/api_key params, F15 IFTTT-key shift-left validation. (F12 already covered by pin.yml’s existing failure-alert step.)

9. Resume Command

Read HANDOFF.md. Then implement the deterministic em-dash strip: strip (U+2014) from the article body immediately before the review gate in generate_posts.py (TDD — add a test that content with em dashes comes back with zero, mirroring scrub_banned_phrases). Run ./.venv/Scripts/python.exe -m pytest test_pipeline.py -q (expect all green), then branch claude/happypet-recovery-35-em-dash-strip, PR, and merge once CI is green. Do not enable the generate.yml cron, lower the reviewer thresholds, or trigger a live generate.yml run without asking the Director first (a passing run publishes a live article + Pinterest pin). After merging, ask the Director whether to spend ~2¢ on a confirmation run.