HappyPet — Session Handoff (2026-07-21)

Ground truth as of commit c01213f on main. Working tree clean except two long-standing untracked files (CLAUDE.md, GENERATION_RESULT.json) — leave them, pre-existing and gitignored-in-spirit. Test suite: ./.venv/Scripts/python.exe -m pytest test_pipeline.py -q152 passed, 0 failed.

Prior handoff archived as HANDOFF-archive-2026-07-21-1353.md. Auto-memory index: ~/.claude/projects/C--Users-derek-MAEVE-HappyPet/memory/happypet-autonomy-plan.md (current through this session).

DO NOT LOSE PROGRESS: Five PRs shipped and merged to main this session (#66, #67, #69, #71 — plus context). All are done and verified green. Do not re-implement, re-debate, or “clean up” any of them. The exact next step is a Director-gated live smoke-test run, nothing else. Read §2.

1. Mission

HappyPet is a Jekyll affiliate blog (happypetproductreviews.com) with a Python + GitHub Actions content pipeline (generate → publish → deploy → pin). Primary goal (Director, 2026-07-21): get the pipeline running end-to-end with as few elements causing a stoppage or review-hold as possible. The plumbing works; the live blocker is that generated articles keep getting held by the anti-AI reviewer instead of published. This session removed several hold-causes and then, at the Director’s direction, swapped the entire model-routing architecture.

2. Current State

Working and verified (all merged to main this session):

Two live confirmation runs this session, BOTH HELD (nothing published):

Exact next action: Ask the Director whether to run a live smoke-test of the new #71 routing: gh workflow run generate.yml --repo DMoneyOH/HappyPet -f force_cap=1. This is a LIVE run — if it passes review it publishes one article + a Pinterest pin (~pennies). It needs the Director’s explicit “go” every time. After it completes, read the run log for REVIEW PASS/FAIL | human_voice= warmth= and Generated: X | Held: Y to see how the new (cheaper/weaker) chain scores. Do NOT enable the cron.

3. Decisions Made (and Why)

4. Architecture & Key Files

5. Gotchas & Hard-Won Knowledge

6. Conventions In Play

7. Open Questions

  1. How does the new #71 routing actually score? Unproven live. The models are cheaper/weaker than Claude Sonnet 4.5 — a live smoke-test (Director-gated) is the only way to know if it reaches 3/3. Ask before running (it publishes on pass).
  2. Fix the fact-check step? It’s the leading roundup E2E blocker and is unchanged. Options: constrain it to alternative sections; run deterministic scrubs on its output; replace the full-article LLM rewrite with surgical number-hedging. Needs a direction decision. (Was in the Director’s “hold for thoughts” bucket before he pivoted to the routing task.)
  3. Go-live “go” for the generate.yml cron — still the Director’s call, after a clean supervised run.
  4. Mark CI — Tests / pytest a required status check in main branch protection (UI action, can’t be done from code).
  5. Cleanup backlog — held-article GitHub issues are piling up (#68, plus older #52/#59/#62 for cooling-mats; all-held notice #60). May want to close/triage.

8. Do Not Touch

9. Resume Command

Read HANDOFF.md. The 3-stage model-routing refactor (PR #71) and the em-dash / prompt-reconciliation / bar-lowering work (#66/#67/#69) are all DONE and merged to main (commit c01213f) — do not re-implement or re-debate them. Run ./.venv/Scripts/python.exe -m pytest test_pipeline.py -q to confirm 152 pass. Then ask the Director whether to do a live smoke-test of the new routing (gh workflow run generate.yml --repo DMoneyOH/HappyPet -f force_cap=1) — this publishes a live article + Pinterest pin if it passes review, so get an explicit “go” first. Do NOT enable the generate.yml cron, change the model chains at generate_posts.py:65-79, or raise REVIEW_SCORE_MINIMUMS, without the Director’s explicit instruction. The leading open issue is the fact-check step re-trashing roundups (§2/§7 Q2) — raise it before assuming a hold is the generator’s fault.